Python at the pump: A script for filling your gas tank

Here's how I used Python to discover a strategy for cost-effective fill-ups.
222 readers like this.
U.S. makes renewable energy software open source

Internet Archive Book Images. Modified by Opensource.com. CC BY-SA 4.0

I recently began driving a car that had traditionally used premium gas (93 octane). According to the maker, though, it requires only 91 octane. The thing is, in the US, you can buy only 87, 89, or 93 octane. Where I live, gas prices jump 30 cents per gallon jump from one grade to the next, so premium costs 60 cents more than regular. So why not try to save some money?

It’s easy enough to wait until the gas gauge shows that the tank is half full and then fill it with 89 octane, and there you have 91 octane. But it gets tricky to know what to do next—half a tank of 91 octane plus half a tank of 93 ends up being 92, and where do you go from there? You can make continuing calculations, but they get increasingly messy. This is where Python came into the picture.

I wanted to come up with a simple scheme in which I could fill the tank at some level with 93 octane, then at the same or some other level with 89 octane, with the primary goal to never get below 91 octane with the final mixture. What I needed to do was create some recurring calculation that uses the previous octane value for the preceding fill-up. I suppose there would be some polynomial equation that would solve this, but in Python, this sounds like a loop.

#!/usr/bin/env python
# octane.py

o = 93.0
newgas = 93.0   # this represents the octane of the last fillup
i = 1
while i < 21:                   # 20 iterations (trips to the pump)
    if newgas == 89.0:          # if the last fillup was with 89 octane
                                # switch to 93
        newgas = 93.0
        o = newgas/2 + o/2      # fill when gauge is 1/2 full
    else:                       # if it wasn't 89 octane, switch to that
        newgas = 89.0
        o = newgas/2 + o/2      # fill when gauge says 1/2 full
    print str(i) + ': '+ str(o)
    i += 1

As you can see, I am initializing the variable o (the current octane mixture in the tank) and the variable newgas (what I last filled the tank with) at the same value of 93. The loop then will repeat 20 times, for 20 fill-ups, switching from 89 octane and 93 octane for every other trip to the station.

1: 91.0 
2: 92.0 
3: 90.5 
4: 91.75 
5: 90.375 
6: 91.6875 
7: 90.34375 
8: 91.671875 
9: 90.3359375 
10: 91.66796875 
11: 90.333984375 
12: 91.6669921875 
13: 90.3334960938 
14: 91.6667480469 
15: 90.3333740234 
16: 91.6666870117 
17: 90.3333435059 
18: 91.6666717529 
19: 90.3333358765 
20: 91.6666679382

This shows is that I probably need only 10 or 15 loops to see stabilization. It also shows that soon enough, I undershoot my 91 octane target. It’s also interesting to see this stabilization of the alternating mixture values, and it turns out this happens with any scheme where you choose the same amounts each time. In fact, it is true even if the amount of the fill-up is different for 89 and 93 octane.

So at this point, I began playing with fractions, reasoning that I would probably need a bigger 93 octane fill-up than the 89 fill-up. I also didn’t want to make frequent trips to the gas station. What I ended up with (which seemed pretty good to me) was to wait until the tank was about 7⁄12 full and fill it with 89 octane, then wait until it was ¼ full and fill it with 93 octane.

Here is what the changes in the loop look like:

    if newgas == 89.0:            
                                  
        newgas = 93.0
        o = 3*newgas/4 + o/4      
    else:                         
        newgas = 89.0
        o = 5*newgas/12 + 7*o/12 

Here are the numbers, starting with the tenth fill-up:

10: 92.5122272978 
11: 91.0487992571 
12: 92.5121998143 
13: 91.048783225 
14: 92.5121958062 
15: 91.048780887

As you can see, this keeps the final octane very slightly above 91 all the time. Of course, my gas gauge isn’t marked in twelfths, but 7⁄12 is slightly less than 5⁄8, and I can handle that.

An alternative simple solution might have been run the tank to empty and fill with 93 octane, then next time only half-fill it for 89—and perhaps this will be my default plan. Personally, I’m not a fan of running the tank all the way down since this isn’t always convenient. On the other hand, it could easily work on a long trip. And sometimes I buy gas because of a sudden drop in prices. So in the end, this scheme is one of a series of options that I can consider.

The most important thing for Python users: Don’t code while driving!

Tags
Greg Pittman
Greg is a retired neurologist in Louisville, Kentucky, with a long-standing interest in computers and programming, beginning with Fortran IV in the 1960s. When Linux and open source software came along, it kindled a commitment to learning more, and eventually contributing. He is a member of the Scribus Team.

4 Comments

Very cool and practical too. Thanks for sharing.

Be careful here.

When gas stations either do their blending, or order it blended - octane ratings are slightly looser than when what you expect. It might be on the lower or higher end of that 93, or 89.... it could be 88.89 rounded up.

Secondly, winter blends of gasoline are rudely adulterated compared to their sibling summer blends with performance robbing chemical components. This is due to a variety of additives to prevent gelling etc...

Therefore this... neat tool of yours could make your engine knock even harder as an 89 with winter additives is even worse than a summer 89.
Unless you have something to look at the PIDs/AFRs etc... it will hard for you to know.... or you are not beating on your car like its stolen & then you may not really care :)

// For forced injection - you should take greater care.

On the other hand, how seriously should one take the warnings of "knock"? It's not going to instantly trash your car. What if gas companies sold 91 octane gas? By your logic, that may or may not be 91 octane... Some people think putting 93 octane in a car that only requires 87 is giving their car a "treat".

In reply to by Ron Brash (not verified)

Here's a follow-up, maybe a cautionary statement. After following this to some extent, the "check engine light" came on. The problem with this CEL is that it comes on for various reasons, one of which might be that the gas cap is loose (and this car seems to have an issue with the gas cap). After watching this for awhile, I put 3/4 of a tank of 93 octane in and shortly afterward the CEL went out. Due to the gas or the gas cap?
One thing that occurs to me is that one doesn't really know how effective the mixing of the gas is in the tank, so the end result isn't necessarily a homogeneous mixture, at least for a while.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License.