What should “Should be” be? | Opensource.com
What should “Should be” be?
Some community members are already familiar with the “What should opensource.com be?” section on the site. The original idea was to create a section for constant feedback and a place where we could announce new additions and features to the community.
I think calling the section “Should be” is confusing and doesn't serve our original intention. It's meant to be
community-focused—a place where we are transparent and open about the current and future state of opensource.com.
So, maybe a name-change is in order. Something more appropriate and compelling.
Use the comments to make suggestions, and use the thumbs to vote for the ideas that you like and against the ones you don't.
Thanks for your feedback.