New glossary helps break down common open source related terms | Opensource.com

New glossary helps break down common open source related terms

Posted 23 Aug 2013 by 

Rating: 
(5 votes)
open source glossary released
Image by : 

opensource.com

submit to reddit

A couple of months ago, I wrote the first draft of "A Free, Libre and Open Glossary." I am often frustrated by people using terms like "open source" and "free software" loosely, even though they have fixed and clear definitions. There is a web of terms, many of them using ambiguous terms like "open" or "crowd," that frequently confuse and blur the issue.

The glossary is over 5,000 words, which I appreciate is a slog. My hope is that anyone who makes it to the end will never again confuse "crowdsourcing" and "open source" or assume that "free software" costs no money. (For more on the difference between crowdsourcing and open source, see pages 17 and 18 of the PDF).

Although I wrote the original draft, it has been improved by many contributors who either gave me feedback on discussion lists or were bold and edited the live document directly. Some of the changes made the document more political, as free software advocates refused to accept my brushing off of "free software" and "open source" as synonyms. (For more on the divide between free and open, see page 11 of the PDF).

The discussion of the draft glossary also sparked broader reflections on how we should describe our community and the works and licenses that we use. If "free" implies gratis and "open" could mean anything, what do we have left? Some suggestions were for everyone to get behind "libre" or to use the acronym "FLO." Terms of art, like "open source" and "free culture," are also less prone to bastardization than the broader "free" or "open."

Although the PDF/ODT download fixes the glossary in a stable form (which I consider important for referencing and reliability), the living document on which the glossary was drafted and redrafted is still available and I encourage you to make any changes that you like.

 

submit to reddit

6 Comments

craigharffey
Open Source Evangelist

Very interesting and a good reference for licence virgins like myself.

.....but cant help wonder at any surprise why many big corporates avoid involvement, can get quite confusing:

http://www.zdnet.com/news/preventing-open-source-software-contamination/...

Vote up!
4
Vote down!
0
Sanglorian
Open Enthusiast

Thanks for the contribution, Craig. That's a good read.

It certainly can get confusing - I'm glad that among the non-software licences, the CC licences have very quickly become dominant. That makes it easier than having >70 FLOSS licences to tackle.

Vote up!
4
Vote down!
0
dboth
Open Enthusiast

I wonder why neither document opens. I am on Fedora 19 using Okular and LibreOffice.

Vote up!
0
Vote down!
0
holmja
Open Source Sensei

David, are you getting any kind of error message? I had no problems opening either document with the same setup you have. I even re-downloaded the files to double check.

Vote up!
0
Vote down!
0
dboth
Open Enthusiast

Doing a "save link as" did not work for me. I just got some error indicating that the document could not open. I did open the PDF in a new tab in my browser and saved it from there which did work.

Thanks for your response and it is a very helpful document.

Vote up!
0
Vote down!
0
holmja
Open Source Sensei

I'm glad you got it downloaded. It really is a nice document. Kudos to Chris Sakkas and everyone else to contributed to it.

Vote up!
0
Vote down!
0