Facebook's new sponsored stories feature: Are you ready to be in your favorite companies' ads?

Register or Login to like
Register or Login to like
open source button on keyboard


Facebook announced this week that they will begin republishing user information in ads in a feature called "sponsored stories." They'll be using your likes and check-ins with sponsors in ads that your friends will see.

The controversy (doesn't it seem like there always has to be controversy with a Facebook announcement?) is that you can't opt out. Facebook's defense is that they're not telling anyone anything they wouldn't have seen anyway. If you check in at Cora's Cafe, that shows up in your friends' news feed in accordance with the level of privacy you've specified. It may also now appear in an ad for Cora's Cafe on the right of the page (where ads already are). The logic goes that if you like a business (in the Facebook sense of the word), you're publicly showing support for them and wouldn't object to having your appreciation used to benefit them.

Several people have noted that it seems like a watered down spin on Beacon, which Facebook discontinued in 2009 after a lawsuit.

Facebook's Statement of Rights and Responsibilities says that "you own all of the content and information you post on Facebook, and you can control how it is shared through your privacy and application settings." I assume Facebook would contend that because they're sharing things only to people who would see the same information in their news feeds, your privacy settings also apply to the sponsored stories. I also assume that many users would disagree--that being involuntarily used as a corporate spokesperson should involve its own privacy setting.

How do you feel about sponsored stories? A reasonable revenue stream for Facebook and appropriate extension of its abilities? Or another violation of its users' trust--what little might be left?

Ruth Suehle is the community leadership manager for Red Hat's Open Source and Standards team. She's co-author of Raspberry Pi Hacks (O'Reilly, December 2013) and a senior editor at GeekMom, a site for those who find their joy in both geekery and parenting.


...that Facebook is obnoxious and doesn't get that most people don't like having their personal data used for marketing purposes.

I haven't seen it in action yet. Anyone else?

And yet we both keep using it. :-)

Based on the number of replies to the video along the lines of, "I love it! When can we use it?", I don't think it's available yet.

I'm more offended that the aquarium in the example misspells "aquarium."

I wonder if people would go for a paid Facebook account (not starting a rumor or hoax here, just an idea) that would remove all "commercial" content from your view of the site, for roughly the equivalent "value" that Facebook gets from having it there in the first place.

They're potentially helping local businesses and provides funding for all the features of Facebook that are (for me at least) popular and useful like sharing photos and videos.

I can see how people would be upset about this. We also haven't seen what sort of weird side-effects we'll see from this. I guess it's something we'll have to live with for now since it's free.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.