I hear the issues, and I for one do not want to have to pay for "buy ups" such as email. I would assume that walled gardens such as this will fail anyways (see classmates or aol mail). However, why is there no ferver over edge Content Deliver Networks. With third parties such as this, companies with money are getting a superior service that companies who can not afford to pay for the improved hosting. Is the issue in this case "who pays"? I get the feeling that if the company pays, it is ok. But, if the consumer pays.. then it is a net neutrality issue. Am I missing something?
Authored Comments
I hear the issues, and I for one do not want to have to pay for "buy ups" such as email. I would assume that walled gardens such as this will fail anyways (see classmates or aol mail). However, why is there no ferver over edge Content Deliver Networks. With third parties such as this, companies with money are getting a superior service that companies who can not afford to pay for the improved hosting. Is the issue in this case "who pays"? I get the feeling that if the company pays, it is ok. But, if the consumer pays.. then it is a net neutrality issue. Am I missing something?