Could open source increase fairness and transparency in redistricting? | Opensource.com

Could open source increase fairness and transparency in redistricting?

Image by : 

opensource.com

x

Get the newsletter

Join the 85,000 open source advocates who receive our giveaway alerts and article roundups.

State legislatures around the United States have been going through a redistricting process where they are updating the electoral boundaries that will impact future elections. Do you think the open source way could play a role in this process?

The goal of redistricting in the U.S. is to balance the number of people that each member of Congress represents. For example, if a state has 5 million people and 10 congressional districts, each district should have around 500,000 people in it, balancing the population to elected representation.

The redistricting process often occurs the year after new U.S. census data is released. States then redraw the boundaries of their districts in response to reported population changes. However, the redistricting process is highly political, and state legislatures are often accused of manipulating geographic boundaries to create partisan districts, often known as gerrymandering.

Open thread

Could transparency, openness, and data-driven analysis create an outcome that is more fair for the people instead of the politicians? Would a more open process prevent gerrymandering or any political gain from this cat and mouse game?

Topics

About the author

Jason Hibbets
Jason Hibbets - Jason Hibbets is a senior community architect at Red Hat which means he is a mash-up of a community manager and project manager for Opensource.com. He primarily works with the DevOps Team and Open Organization community. He is the author of The foundation for an open source city and has been with Red Hat since 2003. Follow him on Twitter: @jhibbets for a fun and shareable feed of his open source (and other)...