Open Hardware Summit open to hybrid models

Register or Login to like
Register or Login to like
open source button on keyboard

If there was an overarching message from the speakers at last week's Open Hardware Summit, particularly those in the first morning block, it's that openness isn't that critical. It sounds strange coming from a conference whose name starts with "open," but speaker after speaker talked about hybrids and doing whatever worked, not just doing what was open.

That's not to say they don't believe in the power of openness. The first words of Wired magazine editor-in-chief Chris Anderson's opening keynote were the very foundation of open source: "Everything I've learned as I built my own business is because people shared what they knew."

But he went on to reflect on the past few years that have been the real beginning of the open hardware movement and its organization, saying, "This is not the time to be dogmatic. We have to evolve as we grow. There are many open hardware businesses, and somebody in this room will build a billion-dollar one. Not by sticking to the plan from three years ago and being rigid about it, but by learning from the community."

The bulk of Anderson's keynote was about the seven lessons he's learned about the limitations of open source hardware, from unstoppable cloning to challenges with investors, marketing, and pricing. Interspersed with those limitations, however, were stories of open source success, like one in which one of his company's "pirates," a Chinese company that was cloning their board, ended up becoming a part of the company. How? They simply asked him be a participant, rather than treating him like the enemy.

His conclusion was a set of "alternatives"—a conditional license with restrictions on commercial use, releasing schematics only, or having open software for closed hardware. "I don't think we should be dogmatic," Anderson repeated. "We need to consider other possibilities and approaches to open-based innovation."

Many in the audience were waiting for the afternoon session that included Bre Pettis, co-founder and CEO of MakerBot, creators of a popular open source 3D printer. Earlier in the week, the company announced its latest product, the Replicator 2 3D printer. At the same time, Pettis announced to much controversy, "For the Replicator 2, we will not share the way the physical machine is designed or our GUI because we don’t think carbon-copy cloning is acceptable and carbon-copy clones undermine our ability to pay people to do development."

In his Open Hardware Summit talk, he mentioned those who make improved derivatives positively. Cloners, on the other hand, he felt more strongly about. "People said, 'You did open source hardware; this is totally allowed under the license. What did you expect?'" he explained. "It's true. They're right. This is the result of something we did, but that doesn't mean we have to like it."

He said that they chose not to share the design files for the Replicator 2 body because of materials. It's made of powder-coated steel and requires a manufacturing facility for the steel-bending—not something the average garage hobbyist could do. They're also keeping the GUI closed for the MakerBot MakerWare software to maintain control over the look and feel.

But in Pettis' brief remarks beyond the week's controversy ("Enough drama," he said, "let's talk about the future."), Pettis was optimistic about the power and potential of open source.

"With the tools we have today, we have the opportunity to take manufacturing back into homes, back into garages," he said. "Now we're in a place with 3D printing and the tools we're collectively making—we have an opportunity to inspire so much creativity in the world."

Pettis asked how many in this room of people who had gathered to discuss open hardware were able to create open source infrastructure in their day jobs. About a third of the room responded that they do. "What do we have to do so that all of you can raise your hands to that question so we can all contribute to the greater good?", he asked.

The Open Hardware Summit was also the official launch of the Open Source Hardware Association, which held this year's event and is now accepting members. The open hardware community is increasingly coming together, and even in the criticisms of the challenges of openness and the voice of one who has pulled away from a purely open philosophy, there's still belief in its potential. Open hardware still offers a lot of advantages, which Anderson mentioned as well, from free to low-cost R&D and customers doing the product development to what he called a "natural business model." What remains to be seen is how much the community will continue to embrace openness in the face of challenges that set the hardware world apart from software.

Ruth Suehle is the community leadership manager for Red Hat's Open Source and Standards team. She's co-author of Raspberry Pi Hacks (O'Reilly, December 2013) and a senior editor at GeekMom, a site for those who find their joy in both geekery and parenting.


I don't understand how a site called can publish a article promoting "proprietarism" .

I make by objection on the basis of honesty. These people and companies are not promoting open source, open hardware or in fact promoting anything open. And all of this article was just an opportunity to make to some commercial propaganda for proprietary companies. They are in fact dishonest.

Their statements about clones (something that just the most common thing in open source software and a natural consequence) wasn't even questioned or confirmed.

Sad, shortsighted, and suicidal.

I think you're not seeing a difference between "promoting" and "reporting."

I too am disturbed by what happened at the Open Hardware Summit. I can’t say that I’m suprised though as this is the danger of “Open Source”.

However, I disagree with the previous poster and think that this article does belong on It is important for us to understand the attacks people are making against freedom.

Ruth, I disagree with you that this was the "overarching message" from OHS's speakers. I didn't hear this argument from any speaker other than Anderson and Pettis, and at least one talk -- Leah Beuchley's -- carried a contrary message. Admittedly, Anderson was the keynote speaker, but I don't think the content of his talk was endorsed by anyone else. Most of the speakers focused on their individual projects, and if there was a common theme, it was a humanitarian one: enthusiasm for the many ways open source hardware is improving people's lives.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.