Chris Grams

Authored Content

Authored Comments

To put it in my brand positioning nerd mindset, for me personally, working for a mission-based company would be the "point of difference" and having decent benefits would be a "point of parity," meaning that the benefits would only have to be "good enough" that given how excited I am about the company, I'd still want to work there.

I agree with you that everyone does not think that way though. Many people have really good reasons why benefits would be their point of difference and having a great mission would just be a nice side benefit, and I totally respect that.

My big point is that there *are* other people out there like me who care more about the mission than the perks, and when you read the materials surrounding the Best Places to Work list (even though there are many companies on the list that DO have great missions), that doesn't seem to be a key thread in the way the listed is developed.

I think it should be.

Hi Tarus... very interesting suggestion... wonder if Chris thinks of himself that way?