Chris Grams

Authored Content

Authored Comments

Thanks Gary, for pointing this out. I've made a change to the first paragraph that should correct the error.

Hi Grizzly!

My thought is that there are two potential impacts here:

1) brands with the term "wiki" embedded in their name might see some issues from people assuming they are connected to WikiLeaks (even if the only connection is the word "wiki"). Here's a good list on Wikipedia of Wiki-based brands that may see some impact:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wikis

2) organizations considering collaboration or sharing initiatives may hesitate to move forward based on fear of stolen secrets caused by what they've seen play out with WikiLeaks. Elliott Massie does a nice job articulating this risk in the quote I've pulled out above.

Wikis within organizations that aren't branded publicly as wiki-based probably will see less trouble, unless risk-averse executives notice that this technology makes sharing/transparency easier and eradicate them because of reason #2.