Simon Phipps

1222 points
Simon Phipps (smiling)
Southampton, UK

Computer industry and open source veteran Simon Phipps started Public Software, a European host for open source projects, and volunteers as President at OSI and a director at The Document Foundation. His posts are sponsored by Patreon patrons - become one if you'd like to see more!

Over a 30+ year career he has been involved at a strategic level in some of the world’s leading technology companies. He has worked in such hands-on roles as field engineer, programmer and systems analyst, as well as run a software publishing company. He worked with networking standards in the eighties, on the first commercial collaborative conferencing software in the nineties, and helped introduce both Java and XML at IBM.

In mid-2000 he joined Sun Microsystems where he helped pioneer Sun’s employee blogging, social media and community engagement programmes. In 2005 he was appointed Chief Open Source Officer at Sun Microsystems, coordinating Sun’s extensive participation in Free and Open Source software communities until he left in 2010. In that role he oversaw the conversion to Free software of the full Java platform and the rest of Sun’s broad software portfolio, all under OSI-approved Free licenses.

He takes an active interest in several Free and Open Source software organisations and also serves as a director of the UK's Open Rights Group, campaigning for digital rights. He was previously instrumental in the revival of the Open Source Initiative, serving as a director and as its President, a role to which he has now returned. A widely read thought-leader, he publishes regularly both on his own blog and in many other places such as IDG’s InfoWorld.

Authored Content

Authored Comments

One challenge of Google's (and Microsoft's) implementation of ODF is that they do not provide the means to collaborate in a multi-user workflow to ODF users. Both vendors strip all sorts of information from ODF files (notably change tracking) when they convert them to their own formats and also export only the text itself when they export to ODF. Once you have imported and ODF document, you are meant to stay and use only the vendors' proprietary tools.

That means both Google and Microsoft see ODF merely as a variant of RTF; a bridge for extracting users from open workflows and locking them in to proprietary workflows. Until this issue gets addressed, I take little comfort from either implementation of ODF.

I understand LibreOffice 4.2 will introduce Google Drive read/write support.