Computer industry and open source veteran Simon Phipps started Public Software, a European host for open source projects, and volunteers as President at OSI and a director at The Document Foundation. His posts are sponsored by Patreon patrons - become one if you'd like to see more!
Over a 30+ year career he has been involved at a strategic level in some of the world’s leading technology companies. He has worked in such hands-on roles as field engineer, programmer and systems analyst, as well as run a software publishing company. He worked with networking standards in the eighties, on the first commercial collaborative conferencing software in the nineties, and helped introduce both Java and XML at IBM.
In mid-2000 he joined Sun Microsystems where he helped pioneer Sun’s employee blogging, social media and community engagement programmes. In 2005 he was appointed Chief Open Source Officer at Sun Microsystems, coordinating Sun’s extensive participation in Free and Open Source software communities until he left in 2010. In that role he oversaw the conversion to Free software of the full Java platform and the rest of Sun’s broad software portfolio, all under OSI-approved Free licenses.
He takes an active interest in several Free and Open Source software organisations and also serves as a director of the UK's Open Rights Group, campaigning for digital rights. He was previously instrumental in the revival of the Open Source Initiative, serving as a director and as its President, a role to which he has now returned. A widely read thought-leader, he publishes regularly both on his own blog and in many other places such as IDG’s InfoWorld.
Authored Comments
I <a href="http://webmink.com/2010/04/14/seven-patent-reforms-while-we-wait-for-nirvana/">wrote about this a while back</a> (I'd be interested in your views) and I'd generally agree with your points (especially about removing access to injunctive relief). I do think there's another problem to be tackled, though. Trolls use income from early shake-downs to fund larger attacks. Steps to erode that war-chest are important.
So for example I'd want to make it easier for those who settle out of court to recover the money they paid when the patents involved are later invalidated. I think that simple move would itself make trolls rarer.
While I agree that open source subscriptions are usually lower cost than proprietary purchases at present, the reason for that in my view is that <ol><li>proprietary prices are inflated rather than that open source subscriptions are less valuable, and <li>legacy procurement rules mean we have to undercut the pricing of proprietary solutions to overcome the procedural biases in their favour.</ol>
As we succeed with open source businesses, I believe that differential will close, and as companies realise their need for full-lifecycle budgeting may well exceed their need for a low up-front cost we may even see the extra value I believe is inherent in open source reflected in a premium being paid for the flexibility and empowerment gained from software freedom. I've written a series of articles about this <a href="http://webmink.com/essays/#Procure">on my personal blog</a>, of which the article you reference is a member.