6 reasons why Guayadeque is a music lover's open source player

7 readers like this.
Record player with an LP spinning

Opensource.com. CC BY-SA 4.0

Recently I upgraded my laptop's Linux to the latest release, and I was surprised and saddened to discover that the wonderful music player Guayadeque seems to be considered as dead upstream, at least in Debian and Ubuntu. In a January blog post, the original author Juan Rios (@anonbeat) wrote that he is no longer able to support the code, which relies on outdated version of GStreamer 0.10. (When I asked about the status of Guayadeque on AskUbuntu, someone replied that it can now be built from source using the code on GitHub, so I'm keeping my fingers crossed.)

Lately I have been experimenting with other players—most notably Quod Libet—but I still really like Guayadeque's feature set. I've been thinking about what I like about Guayadeque, and how other open source music players stack up against this set of criteria.

What I love about Guayadeque

  1. Guayadeque can be configured to pass the music through unchanged to Alsa, allowing music to switch bit rate and bit depth on the fly, and making it simple to put the signal into an external digital-audio converter dedicated to music reproduction.
  2. It has a great "smart playlist" feature, which is what you need to keep the great tunes coming while you're cooking that wonderful dinner.
  3. Although Guayadeque uses playlists, it isn't as obviously playlist-centric as say Amarok or Exaile. I prefer playlists to be there when I want them and otherwise get out of the way. That is, sometimes I just want to double-click on an album and have it play.
  4. Guayadeque's orientation to cover art seems flexible and useful. In particular, a directory of free downloads/samples can maintain their cover art without having to organize them into a less-chaotic structure, even while the rest/majority of the music library can rely on finding a "cover.jpg" in the album directory.
  5. Guayadeque shows the signal level and effective bit rate as the music plays.
  6. Guayadeque has good to great overall organization, layout, and performance.

Really the first item on the list is the critical feature for me; the rest all enhance the experience to a greater or lesser degree.

What about the alternatives?

Quod Libet

Quod Libet also meets the first requirement on my list, and does well at items 3 and 6. It's not as good at cover art, and I finally gave up and reorganized all those free downloads I've picked up over the years. The excellent online guide explains how to use the search capability to make smart playlists. I haven't managed to find options to see signal level and bit rate as the music plays, but the website is jam-packed with information and there are many plugins available, so maybe somewhere in there...


I tried gmusicbrowser a year or so ago and quite liked it. At the time, it had a problem shutting down properly (at least in its Unity/Ubuntu incarnation). I've taken another look at it and I still like it. To get my first requirement sorted, I navigate to Main | Settings | Audio. There I set the gstreamer 1.0 option to Alsa and click on Advanced Options where I can specify my AudioQuest DragonFly digital analog converter in the Alsa Device field as hw:CARD=DragonFly,DEV=0. Works like a charm. In the left panel on the gmusicbrowser display under Audio Properties, I can see that a 96 kHz/24 bit file is recognized as such. And sure enough, when I check the contents of /proc/asound/DragonFly/stream0 I see that the music is playing at that rate.

Gmusicbrowser has a hugely configurable user interface, with the Layout & Make it look like... option as a starting point. It also offers a ton of information about what's being played at the moment: properties of the music file, basic fields (tags), audio properties (noted above), and play statistics. There are lots of options to investigate here.

I haven't figured out how to get level meters nor smart playlists. The album art looks fine. And for sure, given its emulation ability, I can choose my level of interest in playlists.

Finally, in the current version, I seem to be able to close the application without problems.

Gmusicbrowser is a strong contender—it seems more feature-rich, than Quod Libet, with functionality I find useful.

MPD-based players

Besides these two, there are all the MPD-based players. Because I use MPD for the home stereo music server, perhaps I should consider it on my laptop as well. MPD certainly meets my first requirement (passing the music through unchanged), but my experience to date is that the available MPD front ends have fewer features than Guayadeque, Quod Libet, or gmusicbrowser.

I'm leaving out Amarok, Clementine, and Exaile because they are—as far as I can tell, anyway—too "playlist oriented" for my taste. But I welcome any corrections. I'm also leaving out Rhythmbox because I cannot determine how to make it compatible with my smart-playlist requirement. In theory, passing the music through unchanged on Rhythmbox should be possible because it uses gstreamer, which can use Alsa.

Do you have any other great open source music player suggestions for me to test drive? What is your favorite open source audio player? Take our poll.

Chris Hermansen portrait Temuco Chile
Seldom without a computer of some sort since graduating from the University of British Columbia in 1978, I have been a full-time Linux user since 2005, a full-time Solaris and SunOS user from 1986 through 2005, and UNIX System V user before that.


then you have yet to experience "Deadbeef".

Thanks, David, I will put it on my list (despite its not-so-appetizing name).

In reply to by David Warfield (not verified)

Thanks for the comment, AdamL.

I read your reference and I see the 0xDEADBEEF mentioned on the site for the player but I don't understand how the name came to be associated with the software. Did I miss something?

I promise to take a look at DeaDBeeF in the near future...

In reply to by AdamL (not verified)

I prefer hi-fidelity first, always seem to come back to audacious. I also have tested out linux distros and their variants such as xfce, kde, mate etc. and have found audacious to work equally well on most though sometimes the versions available can be different.

The only big con which holds true for most players is the lack of integrated search feature for streaming sites like shoutcast, tunein and types like grooveshark.

for Windows two high quality players are foobar2000 and xmplay.

Thanks poyliam.

I will take a look at audacious.

For sure fidelity is important. You will see that my principle #1 is that the music has to go through to ALSA without tampering.

Good point about the online music sources. That's another thing I like about Guayadeque - it has a great "radio" section!

With respect to the players for non-Linux operating systems, thanks for the pointer. I hope I never have to use them!

In reply to by poyliam (not verified)

VLC? i love it..

Thanks for the comment, freem41.

VLC is cool for videos but how good is it at handling music libraries? Please give us some more details...

In reply to by freem41 (not verified)

Thanks for the comment, metak.

Good to hear about that ppa for Ubuntu users. Have any other distros excluded it? Is there something like a ppa for those distros?

In reply to by metak (not verified)

I don't know for other distros, but beside that ubuntu ppa, arch has it in AUR 'guayadeque-git' which has support for gstreamer-1.0. Fedora also...

Dunno if some distros excluded it though. The project is actively maintained on github.

Latest stable release seems to depend on gstreamer0.10 so you'd have to build from git to use gstreamer-1.0 I guess.

In reply to by clhermansen

Thanks, metak. That's a good pointer for the arch folks.

I believe the "build from source" option can / will use gstreamer-1.0 (or so I was told when I asked on AskUbuntu).

In reply to by metak (not verified)

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License.