Four email clients for your Linux terminal

Top 4 open source command-line email clients

Image by : 

Judith E. Bell. Modified by Opensource.com. CC BY-SA 2.0.

Like it or not, email isn't dead yet. And for Linux power users who live and die by the command line, leaving the shell to use a traditional desktop or web based email client just doesn't cut it. After all, if there's one thing that the command line excels at, it's letting you process files, and especially text, with uninterrupted efficiency.

Open source email clients

For more open source email clients, see our complete collection.

Fortunately, there are a number of great command-line email clients, many with a devoted following of users who can help you get started and answer any questions you might have along the way. But fair warning: once you've mastered one of these clients, you may find it hard to go back to your old GUI-based solution!

To install any of these four clients is pretty easy; most are available in standard repositories for major Linux distributions, and can be installed with a normal package manager. You may also have luck finding and running them on other operating systems as well, although I haven't tried it and can't speak to the experience.

Mutt

Many terminal enthusiasts may already have heard of or even be familiar with Mutt and Alpine, which have both been on the scene for many years. Let's first take a look at Mutt.

Mutt supports many of the features you've come to expect from any email system: message threading, color coding, availability in a number of languages, and lots of configuration options. It supports POP3 and IMAP, the two most common email transfer protocols, and multiple mailbox formats. Having first been released in 1995, Mutt still has an active development community, but in recent years, new releases have focused on bug fixes and security updates rather than new features. That's okay for many Mutt users, though, who are comfortable with the interface and adhere to the project's slogan: "All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less."

Alpine

Alpine is the other well-known client for terminal email, developed at the University of Washington and designed to be an open source, Unicode-friendly alternative to Pine, also originally from UW.

Designed to be friendly to beginners, but also chocked full of features for advanced users, Alpine also supports a multitude of protocols—IMAP, LDAP, NNTP, POP, SMTP, etc.—as well as different mailbox formats. Alpine is packaged with Pico, a simple text editing utility that many use as a standalone tool, but it also should work with your text editor of choice: vi, Emacs, etc.

While Alpine is still infrequently updated, there is also a fork, re-alpine, which was created to allow a different set of maintainers to continue the project's development.

Alpine features contextual help on the screen, which some users may prefer to breaking out the manual with Mutt, but both are well documented. Between Mutt and Alpine, users may want to try both and let personal preference guide their decision, or they may wish to check out a couple of the newer options below.

Sup

Sup is the first of two of what can be called "high volume email clients" on our list. Described as a "console-based email client for people with a lot of email," Sup's goal is to provide an interface to email with a hierarchical design and to allow tagging of threads for easier organization.

Written in Ruby, Sup provides exceptionally fast searching, manages your contact list automatically, and allows for custom extensions. For people who are used to Gmail as a webmail interface, these features will seem familiar, and Sup might be seen as a more modern approach to email on the command line.

Notmuch

Notmuch

"Sup? Notmuch." Notmuch was written as a response to Sup, originally starting out as a speed-focused rewrite of some portions of Sup to enhance performance. Eventually, the project grew in scope and is now a stand-alone email client.

Notmuch is also a fairly trim program. It doesn't actually send or receive email messages on its own, and the code which enables Notmuch's super-fast searching is actually designed as a separate library which the program can call. But its modular nature enables you to pick your favorite tools for composing, sending, and receiving, and instead focuses on doing one task and doing it well—efficient browsing and management of your email.


This list isn’t by any means comprehensive; there are a lot more email clients out there which might be an even better fit for you. What’s your favorite? Did we leave one out that you want to share about? Let us know in the comments below!

Tags

8 Comments

sethkenlon

Rmail, run within Emacs, is pretty great as well. Hit 'h' to view messages as a list, use the 'epa' module to encrypt and decrypt with GPG, and all the modern conveniences of Emacs. I switched to it from mutt about a year ago and have been really happy with it.

Vote up!
1
Vote down!
0
Jason Baker

I'm more of a vi person so I haven't tried Rmail, but it sounds like it's a good choice if you're already versed in Emacs-fu.

Vote up!
0
Vote down!
0
Dorian

Give NMH a shot; by far the most flexible email client I've ever used.

Vote up!
0
Vote down!
0
rtg

Before Alpine there was Pine, which I used for many years. But these days I use RMAIL since I more or less live within Emacs. It's lightweight, fast, easy to configure and use. Also nice to see other RMAIL users out there.

Vote up!
1
Vote down!
0
medelbou

thanks Jason Baker for the idea

Vote up!
0
Vote down!
0
pjharper

Related to notmuch is a client called 'alot'. Have a look at 'Email Workflow for Champions': http://deferred.io/posts/2013/01/13/email-workflow-for-champions.html

Vote up!
0
Vote down!
0
Tomi

In early '90s I used elm for a while, then switched to VM emacs client which I used 15 years.
After that I used Gnus for 5 years or so.
Since that I've been using Notmuch emacs client. The 2 most useful things in my use
is fast search and ability to run multiple notmuch emacs instances at the same time!

Vote up!
0
Vote down!
0
bangorme

Terminal? Are you kidding me? Yeah, I used teletypes before terminal, but it is now the 21st century. Please be serious and recommend four modern UI's.

Vote up!
0
Vote down!
-1