![User profile image.](/sites/default/files/pictures/photo_1.png)
| Follow @peppecassibba
Italy
Lucky husband, open source passionate. Curious by nature. Proud of my roots, happy to mix and learn from different roots
Lucky husband, open source passionate. Curious by nature. Proud of my roots, happy to mix and learn from different roots
Authored Comments
Hi Vzhik,
this is a good question. Even if everyone would like to have an answer with a simple number, performance problem is something more complex. It depends heavily on what is for you an acceptable performance and what kind of service you are exposing.
For example, a Raspberry PI used as a simple web server providing static html pages could be able to handle 100 simultaneous connections managing correctly caching and queues. But response times could not be so satisfying for you (Raspberry PI has limited networking capabilities). In this configuration, using an external CDN could help in improving performances. But we are describing an example of static pages with no logging/booking services, which is completely different from QloApps case.
Consider that 100 simultaneous visits is a very heavy traffic. If you have so many visits, you should evaluate going to a business grade service.
Hi Jason,
happy for your test. please remember, for a real case use, to evaluate all attention required. Above all, remember to backup frequently your data and test your restore procedure.
I've just seen upswift link you posted and I find it really interesting. Hope to be able to test it in near future.