What should “Should be” be? | Opensource.com

What should “Should be” be?

Image by : 


Some community members are already familiar with the “What should opensource.com be?” section on the site. The original idea was to create a section for constant feedback and a place where we could announce new additions and features to the community.

I think calling the section “Should be” is confusing and doesn't serve our original intention. It's meant to be

community-focused—a place where we are transparent and open about the current and future state of opensource.com.

So, maybe a name-change is in order. Something more appropriate and compelling.

Use the comments to make suggestions, and use the thumbs to vote for the ideas that you like and against the ones you don't.

Thanks for your feedback.

About the author

Jason Hibbets
Jason Hibbets - Jason Hibbets is a senior community evangelist in Corporate Marketing at Red Hat where he is a community manager for Opensource.com. He has been with Red Hat since 2003 and is the author of The foundation for an open source city. Prior roles include senior marketing specialist, project manager, Red Hat Knowledgebase maintainer, and support engineer. Follow him on Twitter: @jhibbets